Well. We All Know That The Original Leaker Was An Aggrieved Afghan.

https://news.sky.com/story/thousands-more-afghans-affected-by-second-data-breach-ministers-say-13412464

So aggreived because his penchant for repeated sexual activity with infants made him incompatible with Britain's; "Public Morals." 

But, quick question: It is absolutely, definitely Barings Law who represented him in his original application. Along with his ongoing settlement?

As I'd hate to get that sort of precise, exact legal detail wrong. Particularly if I were still chasing a juicy commission on his behalf.

After all. Such a mistake would, automatically, see me classified as an; "Enemy of the State."

And back in the day, long before beautiful Cherie's 1997 runway, all we'd be left was trying to fins an available yardarm, for a quick two-step.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V12FuCX9xJM (Drunken Sailor, The Irish Rovers, Official Audio).