Luckily. These Are Not Meta Owned Platforms.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13132753/Olivia-Wilde-braless-Yves-Saint-Laurent-Paris-Fashion-Week.html

https://www.tmz.com/2024/02/27/olivia-wilde-revenge-body-nsfw-ysl-fashion-show-paris-see-through/

So, hopefully, we can have something at least approaching a mature discussion. Regarding the pixelation.

It turns out this is still the Internet. So if I just wanted to look at pictures of women's nipples. Then that's really not going to be a problem.

Obviously context is important.

So if a woman has got a little tipsy at a party and one of her nipples have escaped as she's trying to evade the paparazzi. Then, maybe, there's a case for censoring that. In order to preserve her modesty.

However if it's happened at a fashion event or on a red carpet. Then we can assume it's a deliberate, consensual, statement. In order to understand the statement then we do actually need to see the nipples. Along with their framing.

Take for example this;

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13089009/Zendaya-raciest-look-designer-archive-metallic-robot-suit-Dune-premiere.html

Zendaya was, pretty much, the only person not to do nudity in; "Euphoria." Despite that only drawing more attention to her. There's probably the same expectation in the movie where she stars at the centre of a throuple; "Challengers" (2024).

So in this brave new world of AI assisted Deep Fake porn. Where anyone can add any sort of sensual skin to any celebrity endoskeleton. Very much in the style of; "Ex Machina" (2015). Or as some of us still remember it; "Imagination."

It's actually important to see how much of that is Zendaya's actual skin tone. How much of it is just light projection.

And no, that's not remotely sexual.

If anything, it's possibly the gayest thing I've ever said as a man.

Which is something else they never seem to put in any of the recruiting videos(!)

https://twitterwithbraincells.blogspot.com/2023/10/yep-thats-tracks.html