If They're Allowed To Do It In Afghanistan.

Why shouldn't they be allowed to do it in Russia. Or anywhere else for that matter.

https://english.news.cn/asiapacific/20220930/fe7360191f6444a29a9a4e51da25aca4/c.html

Now is the Security Council really sure it wants to be indulging a discussion of NATO's attack on Nord Stream 2?

Particularly as they're now trying to chuck the Fool of Kabul's bizarre life choice into the mix. At a time when it really couldn't be more obvious that they're never going to amount to anything.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Of Course There's More Than One Type Of Totalitarian Capitalism.

I'm sure Pedro Pascal is familiar with State-Run Totalitarian Capitalism. State Owned Enterprises (SOE's) like Petrobras, PescaPeru, MineroPeru. And all that. However Big Tech's decision to adopt the No Nipples Rule could well be an example of State-Absent Totalitarian Capitalism. Where there are no checks on the power of Corporations. Rather like in the Captaincies before the locals got all nibbly. Or in the time of the Robber Barons during the US' Gilded Age. A small group of very rich people who own the infrastructure got together and decided this is the rule we have to live by now. Not only didn't we tell them to introduce that rule we probably don't even know who they are. We certainly didn't get a vote to put them in a position where they can decide what the rules are. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cW9H4M6eQqc (1913 Massacre, Woody Guthrie, Asch, Audio, Topic). Oh well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_w397SIxbDo (If We Make It Through December, Merl...
Read more