I Have Reviewed Alderson v Booth (1969).
Turns out I wasn't a witness to Monday's (23/12/19) "Event."
I was the muthaf'ckn' arresting officer. Son.
So if I were to suddenly start acting as the accused's defence attorney I'm pretty sure the whole system would start collapsing around our ears.
However the big charge is Attempted Murder. Contrary to the Homicide Act, 1957.
If, as Safa rumours suggest, bones were broken. Then the lesser charge is Grevious Bodily Harm (GBH). Contrary to the Offences Against the Person Act, 1861.
If no bones were broken then it's Actual Bodily Harm (ABH). Contrary to the Offences Against the Person Act, 1861.
Anyway you look at it. It's going to be custodial.
I would assume that when it finally surfaces in 6-9 months he's going to plead to the lesser offence. Which will save us all the costs of having to testify.
Released on time served the Court can then hear mitigation arguments. As to whether a driving ban should be imposed. Or whether it was the fact he was already struggling that drive him to it.
Obviously I'm the witness that just cannot be intimidated.
I should make clear though that I'm really not the main guy in this story.
I'm just the radio operator. The guy who turned up five minutes late. With an extra pair of fists. Should they be needed.
Turns out they weren't needed. Nobody needed to go; "Hands On."
So I think we all made a good account of ourselves that day
Apparently it had blown through, like, 16 triple 9 calls before we brought it to a stop.
Also;
I used to be a traffic warden.
Where I worked with a guy who was actually in one of those canteens.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=mIvE26sJtIE
Just in case the mainland brigades were still wondering where they can take it and stick it.
I was the muthaf'ckn' arresting officer. Son.
So if I were to suddenly start acting as the accused's defence attorney I'm pretty sure the whole system would start collapsing around our ears.
However the big charge is Attempted Murder. Contrary to the Homicide Act, 1957.
If, as Safa rumours suggest, bones were broken. Then the lesser charge is Grevious Bodily Harm (GBH). Contrary to the Offences Against the Person Act, 1861.
If no bones were broken then it's Actual Bodily Harm (ABH). Contrary to the Offences Against the Person Act, 1861.
Anyway you look at it. It's going to be custodial.
I would assume that when it finally surfaces in 6-9 months he's going to plead to the lesser offence. Which will save us all the costs of having to testify.
Released on time served the Court can then hear mitigation arguments. As to whether a driving ban should be imposed. Or whether it was the fact he was already struggling that drive him to it.
Obviously I'm the witness that just cannot be intimidated.
I should make clear though that I'm really not the main guy in this story.
I'm just the radio operator. The guy who turned up five minutes late. With an extra pair of fists. Should they be needed.
Turns out they weren't needed. Nobody needed to go; "Hands On."
So I think we all made a good account of ourselves that day
Apparently it had blown through, like, 16 triple 9 calls before we brought it to a stop.
Also;
I used to be a traffic warden.
Where I worked with a guy who was actually in one of those canteens.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=mIvE26sJtIE
Just in case the mainland brigades were still wondering where they can take it and stick it.
Comments
Post a Comment