Of Course If You Were To Look At My Constitutional Law Portfolio.

Egypt features rather predominantly.

https://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContent/5/33/504974/Arts--Culture/Music/Controversary-smoulders-after-cancellation-of-Trav.aspx

Now, isn't that what every Arab state wants. Being very closely associated with Israel.

So although I like to think I explained it very clearly on both occasions. I feel I should make clear.

There is no right way of doing constitutional law.

There is only a continuous process of trying to balance different degrees of wrong.

All I can do is make people aware of and, hopefully, begin to explain the principles involved. I can't tell people what the right balance is.

That's not me being lazy or trying to dodge the question.

I do not live in either Egypt or Israel. Nor have I ever lived in Egypt or Israel. So I simply cannot tell the people who do what the right compromise is. It is something they can only decide for themselves.

Different compromises work best for different societies. Even the same society, at different times.

So I wouldn't be at all surprised if Egypt and Israel both applied the same principles yet arrived at different conclusions.

For a start, in terms of population alone, Egypt is about ten times the size of Israel.

Although I'm sure there's one thing scholars of all stripes can agree upon;

 "*shakes head* Black Lives Matter are just f'cking idiots."

https://slate.com/culture/2023/05/queen-cleopatra-black-netflix-show-race-history.html

Now. Who remembers that time I tried to replace the Paris Agreement with a sort of 'Climate Constitution'?

Then you all decided to go in a different direction.

How's that working out(!)

https://news.sky.com/story/europe-heatwave-how-is-it-impacting-spain-italy-and-the-continents-other-most-popular-holiday-destinations-12922373