Again, That's Simply Untrue.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49618242
"A bill requiring Boris Johnson to ask for an extension to the UK's departure date to avoid a no-deal Brexit on 31 October is set to gain royal assent."
Having passed the Lords the bill now returns to the Commons. Only if the Commons confirms the bill will it be set/sent to gain Royal Assent.
One would assume that having been granted time for consideration the sponsor will have noticed their glaring error and withdraw it.
A small group of journalists using their position to lobby for the bill to receive Royal Assent certainly violates the legal requirement for due impartiality in TV news.
If OFCOM don't impose a large fine it sounds like the sort of thing RT would bring up at their judicial review of OFCOM's enforcement action.
"A bill requiring Boris Johnson to ask for an extension to the UK's departure date to avoid a no-deal Brexit on 31 October is set to gain royal assent."
Having passed the Lords the bill now returns to the Commons. Only if the Commons confirms the bill will it be set/sent to gain Royal Assent.
One would assume that having been granted time for consideration the sponsor will have noticed their glaring error and withdraw it.
A small group of journalists using their position to lobby for the bill to receive Royal Assent certainly violates the legal requirement for due impartiality in TV news.
If OFCOM don't impose a large fine it sounds like the sort of thing RT would bring up at their judicial review of OFCOM's enforcement action.
Comments
Post a Comment